Research translated into influence

Impact across research, institutions, people and practice

My impact is not defined by one centre. It combines influential research, the creation of durable research environments, responsible AI translated with partners, and the development of people who carry this work forward.

Responsible media AI research framework
Research figure comparing healthiness and environmental impact of recipes
User-centred research in a television production control room

A broader view of impact

From ideas and evidence to organisations and societal value

My work connects four forms of impact: advancing knowledge about how AI shapes human behaviour; building research groups and programmes that outlast individual projects; translating research into tools, field studies, organisational learning and policy input; and mentoring researchers who bring this expertise into academia, industry and public service.

150+peer-reviewed publications
NOK 650m+funding secured or co-secured
20+ yearsacross research and applied innovation
Media · Health · Foodhigh-impact application domains

Four dimensions

How the work creates value

Research impact is strongest when evidence, institutions, people and practice reinforce one another.

Advance knowledge

Develop theories, methods and evidence on responsible AI, recommender systems and computational user behaviour.

Build institutions

Create research groups, programmes, funding portfolios and partnerships that make sustained work possible.

Translate research

Move questions and prototypes into field studies, newsroom workflows, decision support, partner learning and policy discussions.

Develop people

Mentor students and researchers and create pathways into academic, public-sector and industry roles.

Research influence

Evidence across responsible AI, recommendation and behavioural decision-making

The publication record spans foundational recommender-systems research and applied work in media, health and food.

Responsible media technology research framework
Responsible AI & journalism

Designing AI that supports trust without demanding blind trust

Research on professional ethics, provenance, usable transparency and human oversight has helped define responsible media AI as a field of study and practice.

Explore the research →
Feedback loop illustrating popularity bias in recommender systems
Recommender systems

Moving beyond accuracy and short-term engagement

Work on similarity, popularity bias, explanation and long-term user effects advances recommender systems that account for agency, diversity and societal consequences.

See the research initiative →
Research results on recipe healthiness and environmental impact
Health, food & behaviour

Using data and AI to support healthier, more sustainable choices

Cross-country recipe analyses, behavioural studies and AI-tailored advice connect computational methods with nutrition, sustainability and decision support.

View related publications →

Institution building

Creating environments where ambitious research can happen

Some of the most durable impact comes from building teams, programmes and infrastructure rather than from any single paper or prototype.

DARS research group

I founded and lead Norway’s largest research group focused on recommender systems, connecting methodological depth with applications in media, health and food.

Visit DARS →

Computational Behaviour & AI initiative

An interdisciplinary collaboration environment linking behavioural theory, computational modelling, human-centred AI and partner-based evaluation.

Explore the initiative →

Research programmes and funding

A portfolio spanning MediaFutures, NEWSREC, RE-AIMED, CuratedAI, VaccAI and international collaborations creates continuity across questions, people and domains.

See selected funding →

Direct research-to-practice cases

MediaFutures studies where my research is directly visible

Selected cases connecting my own research involvement with MediaFutures, empirical studies, prototypes and partner-relevant evidence.

Curated Annual Report 2025 clipping for climate-news emotional reframing research
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2025
Climate news · emotional framing

AI reframing that makes climate news feel more actionable

MediaFutures research tested whether GPT-generated emotional framing can make difficult climate-related news summaries less avoidable and more motivating. The work shows how responsible AI can support engagement without relying on simplistic clickbait or polarising emotional cues.

My role: Principal investigator of the study, co-author and senior researcher, contributing to the research agenda connecting LLM-generated summaries, news avoidance, recommender systems and pro-social engagement.

Related paper →
Curated Annual Report 2025 clipping for AI-generated satire and news avoidance research
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2025
News avoidance · satire

Using AI-generated satire to reconnect avoidant news users

A MediaFutures study examined whether LLM-generated satirical summaries can make serious news topics more approachable while preserving perceived quality and informational value. The case demonstrates how recommender-system research can explore engagement beyond more-of-the-same personalisation.

My role: Principal investigator of the study, co-author and research supervisor, helping frame the work around news avoidance, responsible recommendation and human-centred evaluation.

Related paper →
Curated Annual Report 2025 clipping for C2PA provenance labels and news trust research
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2025
Project Reynir · C2PA

When people know the source of an image, they trust the news outlet more

A three-country study translated a technical authenticity standard into evidence about image credibility, source transparency and trust in news outlets. The case connects content provenance with concrete user evidence for newsroom and media-cluster innovation.

My role: Principal investigator of the user study, centre director and strategic link to the wider media-cluster initiative.

Related paper →

Selected partner outcomes

MediaFutures as one platform for real-world translation

The cases below are selected collective outcomes from SFI MediaFutures. They show how a long-term research environment can connect evidence with editorial and production settings.

Curated clipping for Faktisk.no verification tools adopted beyond Norway
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2023
Faktisk.no · verification

Verification tools adopted beyond Norway

The Tank Classifier and Language Checker supported conflict verification and were reported as useful to fact-checking teams outside Norway.

My role: Centre-level strategy, partnership environment and research translation; tool development was led by the credited WP3 researchers and Faktisk.no collaborators.

Curated clipping for TV 2 recommendation research evaluated in the wild
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2023
TV 2 · recommendation

Responsible personalisation evaluated with partner data and users

Research on recommendation moved from modelling and prototypes into TV 2 pipelines, user studies and live-platform evaluation.

My role: Scientific contribution to responsible recommendation, centre leadership and development of the long-term TV 2 partnership.

Curated clipping for BGClip editorial AI video summarization
Curated clipping based on the SFI MediaFutures Annual Report 2024
Editorial AI · production

AI that augments professional judgement

BGClip explored faster news-video production with editorial rules built in, while AiModerator investigated contextual support during political debates.

Attribution: BGClip was led by WP3. Context and fact support during political debates was led by WP4. My role was centre-level strategy, funding and partner-facing research infrastructure.

People and professional influence

Impact that continues through others

Training, supervision, evaluation and public engagement extend the value of research well beyond individual projects.

Curated clipping showing a former MediaFutures research assistant moving into practice at TV 2

Talent moving into practice

Former research assistant Snorre Alvsvåg moved from MediaFutures into TV 2, illustrating how centre-based research experience can create pathways from applied AI research into industry practice.

Question
Study
Publication
Next step

Supervision and mentorship

More than 35 MSc and PhD theses have been supervised across Norway, Austria and international partner institutions, with an emphasis on intellectual independence, rigorous study design and publishable contribution.

Expert evaluation and academic service

Independent expert review for the Research Council of Norway, EPSRC, FWO and NWO; invited review service for ERC grants; senior programme-committee service at ACM SIGIR and ACM RecSys; manuscript review or editorial work for Nature Portfolio journals and UMUAI; and invited policy input for governments and public authorities, including the Norwegian government on research–industry collaboration.

Leadership and service

Concrete contributions to academic and professional communities

Selected roles showing how the work extends into conference leadership, institutional governance, editorial responsibility and independent evaluation.

Conference leadership

ACM RecSys and ACM SIGIR

Workshop and Late-Breaking Results Co-Chair at ACM RecSys (2018–2020) and Senior Programme Committee member at ACM SIGIR (2020–2021).

Community building

Workshops and programme committees

Co-organised 14 international workshops, including co-founding HealthRecSys, and served on programme or senior programme committees at 52 international conferences.

Boards, institutions and policy

Media City Bergen, governance and policy input

Former Board Member of Media City Bergen (2021–June 2022), earlier university senate and data-science steering-board service, and invited input to government and public-authority discussions on research, innovation and industry collaboration.

Evaluation and editorial service

Independent review trusted by major institutions

Reviewed grant proposals for EPSRC, FWO and NWO; served as UMUAI Special Issue Editor and on editorial boards across AI, data and information-science journals.

My contribution

How I create the conditions for impact

The recurring pattern is to connect a strong research question with the people, resources and settings needed to test it properly.

Frame the agenda

Identify consequential questions around AI, behaviour, trust, health and democracy.

Build the environment

Assemble teams, partners, governance and funding around a coherent programme.

Generate evidence

Combine computational methods, prototypes and human-centred empirical evaluation.

Translate and sustain

Connect findings to partner learning, new projects, talent development and institutional capacity.

Work with me

Research collaboration, strategic advice or invited speaking

I work with academic, public-sector and industry partners on responsible AI, recommender systems and computational user behaviour.

Documentation note. Claims in the MediaFutures direct research-to-practice and partner cases are based on peer-reviewed papers, project outputs and SFI MediaFutures Annual Reports 2020–2025. The framed visuals are excerpts from those papers, prototypes or reports. MediaFutures outputs remain collective achievements of the researchers and partner organisations credited in the underlying work.

Visit SFI MediaFutures →   View my publication record →